+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: Trump for president (/thread-12458.html)
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 06-22-2016
(06-21-2016, 09:15 PM)Maggot Wrote: Here are the recent files hacked and released from the DNC mostly about Trump and a bunch of talking points. The Clinton foundation secrets will be coming out maybe next week.
Because you're my dear friend I feel a tiny bit sorry that you're going to be so disappointed.
RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 06-22-2016
(06-22-2016, 05:57 AM)Duchess Wrote:(06-21-2016, 09:15 PM)Maggot Wrote: Here are the recent files hacked and released from the DNC mostly about Trump and a bunch of talking points. The Clinton foundation secrets will be coming out maybe next week.
Because you're my dear friend I feel a tiny bit sorry that you're going to be so disappointed.
I'm not disappointed, I like to see politicians squirm and this election hasn't disappointed me.
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 06-26-2016
*ponders* What if the media didn't cover Trump? Huh Huh Huh?
RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 07-06-2016
I saw a poll the other day (I really think all polls are bias) that showed the criminal was ahead by 8 pts to the blustery one. USA today maybe or something. I do see more liberals and lefties doing nasty stuff to supporters of Trump though. I don't really see Trump supporters acting as much like those animals.
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 07-06-2016
I only believe polls when they show me what I want to see.
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 07-06-2016
Today I looked at that poll that I posted a few days ago and it now says Big D 55%, The bitch 28%.
But I do agree with you maggot, all polls are bias.
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 07-06-2016
Two people that Trump has been vetting have come out publicly to say they told him they are not interested in the job. It's probably only a matter of time before he tweets he wasn't really interested in them and wouldn't have offered them the job.
RE: Trump for president - Carsman - 07-07-2016
(07-06-2016, 06:09 PM)Duchess Wrote:
Two people that Trump has been vetting have come out publicly to say they told him they are not interested in the job. It's probably only a matter of time before he tweets he wasn't really interested in them and wouldn't have offered them the job.
It will be funny if the only one willing to run as his VP turns out to be Sarah.
RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 07-07-2016
Why would he have to pick a politician?
RE: Trump for president - Donovan - 07-07-2016
(07-07-2016, 08:37 AM)Maggot Wrote: Why would he have to pick a politician?
Yeah, because the only possible way to improve on hiring a completely inept and unqualified person to run an entire country, is to hire two of them.
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 07-07-2016
GREAT, I'll throw my hat in.
Free beer for all on Sundays, A Iron Horse in every driveway, a AK47 in every gun rack.
Vote, Big D and F.U. We will make Amerka pretty dam good again.
RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 07-07-2016
The whole "Big D" thing makes it sound like you're gushing and crushing on Trump, F.U.
You would make a cute and compatible couple living your shared American dream, I guess.
(If the Big D accepts your offer and picks you as his 'mate', don't sign the pre-nup!)
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 07-07-2016
Don't worry HotD, If Big D offers me the spot you will be the first to know. Now if you will excuse me I have to go get a orange spray tan, dye my hair white and learn how to do a comb over.
RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 07-07-2016
Thanks, F.U.
Call me as soon as Donald gets behind you as his mate.
Scratch that...call me shortly thereafter...when your breathing is less heavy.
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 07-07-2016
(07-07-2016, 11:08 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Thanks, F.U.
Call me as soon as Donald gets behind you as his mate.
Scratch that...call me shortly thereafter...when your breathing is less heavy.
That's more like it. Thanks for the laugh!
RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 07-07-2016
(07-07-2016, 09:41 AM)Donovan Wrote:(07-07-2016, 08:37 AM)Maggot Wrote: Why would he have to pick a politician?
Yeah, because the only possible way to improve on hiring a completely inept and unqualified person to run an entire country, is to hire two of them.
So you think that politicians are the only ones that can govern? Citizens do not have the capacity to make the right choices? I would think that Washington could use a bit of common sense.
RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 07-07-2016
(07-07-2016, 11:14 AM)F.U. Wrote:(07-07-2016, 11:08 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Thanks, F.U.
Call me as soon as Donald gets behind you as his mate.
Scratch that...call me shortly thereafter...when your breathing is less heavy.
That's more like it. Thanks for the laugh!
You just know if Zero was around, a shot-gun wedding photo of you and your Big D would be coming soon.
RE: Trump for president - Blindgreed1 - 07-07-2016
(07-07-2016, 09:41 AM)Donovan Wrote:To be fair hitting "reply all" (as you down played it) from your own personal server on a classified national security document could easily be perceived as inept as well so...(07-07-2016, 08:37 AM)Maggot Wrote: Why would he have to pick a politician?
Yeah, because the only possible way to improve on hiring a completely inept and unqualified person to run an entire country, is to hire two of them.
RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 07-07-2016
That was an "accident"
RE: Trump for president - Blindgreed1 - 07-07-2016
(07-07-2016, 11:43 AM)Maggot Wrote: That was an "accident"So was burning emails, refusing to turn over emails and wiping the server. It just all coincidentally happened around the same time. "This is not the droid the FBI is looking for."