+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Whatever Junk (https://mockforums.net/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: We Don't Give A Fuck About This Forum (https://mockforums.net/forum-16.html)
+--- Thread: Hey rothschild… (/thread-14890.html)
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 09-01-2021
(09-01-2021, 10:36 PM)sally Wrote: I think 2 billion is likely regardless. This is more than likely something from a lab and fixing it around the world with both vaccine and natural immunity is going to be hard. I hope I'm wrong and it just dies out. I'm scared kind of.
We're going to die anyway, one way or another. Maybe this will motivate us to relearn how to survive, so we're a little less dependent on sociopathic technocrats.
RE: Hey rothschild… - crash - 09-01-2021
No, no, no. Let’s not dilute this. The claim was 2 billion people will be dead in three years just because they got vaccinated. Not from any other reason. It’s a wild number. Clock is ticking. Tick, tick, motherfucker..
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 09-02-2021
(09-01-2021, 11:42 PM)crash Wrote: No, no, no. Let’s not dilute this. The claim was 2 billion people will be dead in three years just because they got vaccinated. Not from any other reason. It’s a wild number. Clock is ticking. Tick, tick, motherfucker..
![[Image: bla-bla-bla-gif-8.gif]](https://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/bla-bla-bla-gif-8.gif)
RE: Hey rothschild… - sally - 09-02-2021
RE: Hey rothschild… - sally - 09-02-2021
Silly bastards.
RE: Hey rothschild… - crash - 09-02-2021
Haha…perfect. Just how we all imagine you; blonde, fake and no clue!
You’ve delivered again
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 09-02-2021
It's your thread so I'll let you have the last word, lipschitz.
RE: Hey rothschild… - crash - 10-08-2021
We’re another month on, fuckface, still people aren’t dropping off the perch in massive numbers. Might be time to adjust that tin foil hat. Oh, and yes, I’ll be here every month, just for you, boo…
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 10-08-2021
(10-08-2021, 10:33 AM)crash Wrote: We’re another month on, fuckface, still people aren’t dropping off the perch in massive numbers. Might be time to adjust that tin foil hat. Oh, and yes, I’ll be here every month, just for you, boo…
Shows what you know, lipschitz. The FDA's own advisory panel recently acknowledged that these motherfucking wonderful vaccines are killing people. So yes, please check back in real soon -- assuming you don't croak on us.
RE: Hey rothschild… - Duchess - 10-08-2021
No, rothschild, the advisory panel did not acknowledge that the vaccine/s are killing people. It has been refuted, repeatedly. The comments are attributed to a speaker who is not affiliated with the FDA and were made during the open public hearing portion of a FDA vaccine advisory panel meeting in September.
RE: Hey rothschild… - crash - 10-08-2021
Just to be on track, over 100 million should be dead already. And yeah, shows not what you know, but what you’re stupid enough to believe. The whole FDA bullshit was more twisted propaganda to feed you fucked in the head doomsdayers.
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 10-08-2021
(10-08-2021, 02:00 PM)Duchess Wrote: No, rothschild, the advisory panel did not acknowledge that the vaccine/s are killing people. It has been refuted, repeatedly. The comments are attributed to a speaker who is not affiliated with the FDA and were made during the open public hearing portion of a FDA vaccine advisory panel meeting in September.
Advisory panelists Dr. James Hildreth and Dr. Melinda Wharton both went on record stating they had serious concerns re myocarditis among younger people, a group for whom the risk of dying from COVID is 1 in 250,000.
Here's evidence from UK government statistics that shows a 47% increase in mortality for teenagers 15-19 after vaccination became available. A surge in 911 calls for cardiac arrest shows correlation and likely causation. Stats are linked in the article.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/04/teen-boy-deaths-increased-by-63-percent-since-they-had-covid-vaccine/
Now please explain why there is censorship of everything that disputes HHS bureaucrats, when they clearly do no defer to their own medical-scientific review processes? What is the agenda, because there clearly is one, and it has little or nothing to do with "public health"? Why is VAERS reporting almost nonexistent? It's legally required for all healthcare providers, and without it misinformation is a certainty, so why isn't it being enforced? Why aren't the people who loudly decry misinformation on a daily basis covering this catastrophic breakdown in government reporting?
RE: Hey rothschild… - Clang McFly - 10-09-2021
(10-08-2021, 07:32 PM)rothschild Wrote:(10-08-2021, 02:00 PM)Duchess Wrote: No, rothschild, the advisory panel did not acknowledge that the vaccine/s are killing people. It has been refuted, repeatedly. The comments are attributed to a speaker who is not affiliated with the FDA and were made during the open public hearing portion of a FDA vaccine advisory panel meeting in September.
Advisory panelists Dr. James Hildreth and Dr. Melinda Wharton both went on record stating they had serious concerns re myocarditis among younger people, a group for whom the risk of dying from COVID is 1 in 250,000.
Here's evidence from UK government statistics that shows a 47% increase in mortality for teenagers 15-19 after vaccination became available. A surge in 911 calls for cardiac arrest shows correlation and likely causation. Stats are linked in the article.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/04/teen-boy-deaths-increased-by-63-percent-since-they-had-covid-vaccine/
Now please explain why there is censorship of everything that disputes HHS bureaucrats, when they clearly do no defer to their own medical-scientific review processes? What is the agenda, because there clearly is one, and it has little or nothing to do with "public health"? Why is VAERS reporting almost nonexistent? It's legally required for all healthcare providers, and without it misinformation is a certainty, so why isn't it being enforced? Why aren't the people who loudly decry misinformation on a daily basis covering this catastrophic breakdown in government reporting?
Yeah.....The Expose...sounds like a credible news source....much like those tabloid bullshit rags....
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 10-09-2021
(10-09-2021, 01:47 AM)Clang McFly Wrote:(10-08-2021, 07:32 PM)rothschild Wrote:(10-08-2021, 02:00 PM)Duchess Wrote: No, rothschild, the advisory panel did not acknowledge that the vaccine/s are killing people. It has been refuted, repeatedly. The comments are attributed to a speaker who is not affiliated with the FDA and were made during the open public hearing portion of a FDA vaccine advisory panel meeting in September.
Advisory panelists Dr. James Hildreth and Dr. Melinda Wharton both went on record stating they had serious concerns re myocarditis among younger people, a group for whom the risk of dying from COVID is 1 in 250,000.
Here's evidence from UK government statistics that shows a 47% increase in mortality for teenagers 15-19 after vaccination became available. A surge in 911 calls for cardiac arrest shows correlation and likely causation. Stats are linked in the article.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/04/teen-boy-deaths-increased-by-63-percent-since-they-had-covid-vaccine/
Now please explain why there is censorship of everything that disputes HHS bureaucrats, when they clearly do no defer to their own medical-scientific review processes? What is the agenda, because there clearly is one, and it has little or nothing to do with "public health"? Why is VAERS reporting almost nonexistent? It's legally required for all healthcare providers, and without it misinformation is a certainty, so why isn't it being enforced? Why aren't the people who loudly decry misinformation on a daily basis covering this catastrophic breakdown in government reporting?
Yeah.....The Expose...sounds like a credible news source....much like those tabloid bullshit rags....
If I was to judge you on looks I'd write you off as a fat, ugly crossdresser with a questionable pedigree; fortunately for you, I'm not like that and know that real beauty isn't skin deep. But I also know that some people are just as ugly and stupid as they appear to be.
As for my linky, it sources the government stats that I referred to, or I wouldn't have linked it. But that's me.
RE: Hey rothschild… - Duchess - 10-09-2021
Ooohhhh Clangy, you musta hit a nerve.
You ever notice it's those who won't post a picture of themselves who feel the most comfortable attacking someone's appearance?
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 10-09-2021
(10-09-2021, 04:55 AM)Duchess Wrote: Ooohhhh Clangy, you musta hit a nerve.
You ever notice it's those who won't post a picture of themselves who feel the most comfortable attacking someone's appearance?
He attacked the appearance of my linky, Doochess, and turnabout is fair play -- or so I've heard, you ignorant tit.
RE: Hey rothschild… - Duchess - 10-09-2021
"He attacked the appearance of my linky"
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 10-09-2021
(10-09-2021, 05:18 AM)Duchess Wrote:
It saddens me to see such hurtful intolerance on this fine forum, Doochy. It truly does.
So aren't you going to ask what linky's pronouns are?
RE: Hey rothschild… - Duchess - 10-09-2021
Every time I get under your skin you call me Doochy.
Same goes for Pappy, but he calls me a cunt. *snicker*
Hehehe
RE: Hey rothschild… - rothschild - 10-09-2021
(10-09-2021, 01:24 PM)Duchess Wrote: Every time I get under your skin you call me Doochy.
Same goes for Pappy, but he calls me a cunt. *snicker*
Hehehe
As me what it's pronouns are, ya old tit.
