Trump for president - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: Trump for president (/thread-12458.html) |
RE: Trump for president - FAHQTOO - 10-17-2016 (10-17-2016, 02:28 PM)Duchess Wrote: Well that right there takes the cake. Seriously...a man who made his riches photographing gaping snatches is upset about Trump talking about gaping snatches. Haha! RE: Trump for president - Midwest Spy - 10-17-2016 I have always celebrated women- Larry Flynt What he was trying to say, but just couldn't make clear: I have celebrated the money they brought me as I demeaned and exploited them. What a prick. Just STFU. RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 10-17-2016 (10-17-2016, 06:38 PM)FAHQTOO Wrote: Well that right there takes the cake. Seriously...a man who made his riches photographing gaping snatches is upset about Trump talking about gaping snatches. The king of gaping snatches vs. the don of groping snatches. And not a Bush in sight. November 9th seriously can't get here quickly enough for me. RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 10-18-2016 The loony left has the Trump candidacy creating everything from the racial hatred going on now to destroying the NFL. Next he will be blamed for some wardrobe malfunction someplace. Ya gotta laugh at this stuff. RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 10-18-2016 Heh. That's the first I've heard about Republicans destroying the NFL. RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 10-18-2016 Yeah.................he's screwing up the Paris agreement too. RE: Trump for president - Carsman - 10-18-2016 I've tried very hard to overlook the many short comings of the Donald, and Hillary as well, but I just can't! RE: Trump for president - Carsman - 10-19-2016 (10-18-2016, 07:44 PM)Carsman Wrote: I've tried very hard to overlook the many short comings of the Donald, and Hillary as well, but I just can't! Well, I watched the entire debate tonight, my feelings haven't changed! RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 10-20-2016 Did you think they would? It's 19 days until the election. RE: Trump for president - Carsman - 10-20-2016 The "Flash Poll" right after the debate said Trump won! So, it ain't over till it's over, or until the Fat Lady sings, which ever occurs first! RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 10-20-2016 (10-20-2016, 07:35 AM)Carsman Wrote: The "Flash Poll" right after the debate said Trump won! Winners don't accuse the opposition of cheating...just sayin'. RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 10-20-2016 Too bad for Trump that last night's debate wasn't the first one instead of the last one. I think he did much better. I liked that Wallace's questions focused on issues of contention between the Republican and Democratic parties. When Trump kept rambling about how babies are ripped from the womb the day before they're due, I wish Clinton had pointed out that 90% of abortions are performed in the first trimester and less than 1% are performed in the third trimester. But, she just pointed out that he didn't understand what he was talking about. She was really strong in her support of Roe v. Wade without putting any qualifiers on it (she's confirmed previously that she's open to later term abortion restrictions). Trump gave traditional Republican/conservative answers on the typical issues: he wants to repeal Roe v. Wade; he would let the question of whether abortion should be legal be addressed state-by-state, he opposes any new gun regulation (and issued a warning that the second amendment is under siege), he wants to build a wall to keep illegal immigrants out and deport the ones that are already here. Trump said that he would appoint Supreme Court Justices with conservative views and that he believes the Constitution should be interpreted literally as the founding fathers wrote it. Clinton said she believes the Constitution should be a living document that's interpreted and applied in line with the times and for the benefit of the American people -- she would appoint judges who share that view. She wants Roe v. Wade upheld and gay marriage rights upheld. She said she supports the second amendment, but she wants the background check loopholes closed and safe storage regulations implemented to keep people from getting killed by individuals who shouldn't have a gun and to protect children from harming themselves or others. In regards to immigration, Clinton wants comprehensive reform that focuses on deporting illegal immigrants who are felons or otherwise pose a threat, offers a path to citizenship for productive and law-abiding illegal immigrants, and involves more border security and fences (which she's voted for in the past). She refuted Trump's claim that she wants open borders to let everyone in and confirmed that only vetted immigrants would be welcome on her watch. When Wallace and Trump implied that she wants open immigration borders (from leaked Wall Street transcript), she told them to read the rest of the sentence and context and they'd see that she was talking about clean energy trade/sharing and a cross-border grid for it. Trump called Clinton a liar and interrupted her several times -- same as before. Clinton baited Trump by mocking the fact that he "choked" when meeting with the Mexican President and not getting him to pay for the wall. She also pointed out his hypocrisy in using illegal immigrants in his businesses and threatening to deport them if they complained of low wages, using illegally dumped Chinese steel in the construction of his buildings and casinos, and being Putin's ever-praising puppet (even as U.S. intelligence services agree that the Russian government is stealing U.S. communications and attempting to interfere in our elections and government). So......Trump called Clinton "a nasty woman" and, when asked by Wallace, said he can't commit to accepting the election outcome. He said he'd have to see what happens and he'll keep us in suspense. I think any headway he'd made with undecided voters prior to those two comments probably got washed away. RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 10-20-2016 (10-20-2016, 11:36 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: when asked by Wallace, said he can't commit to accepting the election outcome. He said he'd have to see what happens and he'll keep us in suspense. He told supporters at a rally today, "I will totally accept the results from this great and historic presidential election...if I win." RE: Trump for president - ZEROSPHERES - 10-20-2016 TRUMP Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow .....or Nov 8th RE: Trump for president - Carsman - 10-20-2016 (10-20-2016, 11:03 AM)Duchess Wrote:(10-20-2016, 07:35 AM)Carsman Wrote: The "Flash Poll" right after the debate said Trump won! Just sayin, he's got a lot of supporters, so . . . RE: Trump for president - sally - 10-20-2016 My son is 18 and he doesn't give a shit about this, all his time is taken up with work, college and girls. He has no time to pay attention to this shit. He's not voting. But when he watched the debate with me for a while last night his only comment was that Trump seems more like a human being and Hillary seems like a robot. He's not the only one that feels that way, it's plain as day and that's exactly what got Trump this far and the reason he's going to win. RE: Trump for president - sally - 10-20-2016 And I didn't think either one of them said anything significant on the national debt, medicare, healthcare or SS. People are just voting on personality and Trump's is more personable. That shit about him dehumanizing women is a bunch of bullshit. He's going to win, get ready for it Duchess, Dono, and HotD. Your food stamps are history, Clang. RE: Trump for president - BigMark - 10-20-2016 A wall can be a fence, it can be sensors or the national guard who get paid to sit on their asses right now. RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 10-20-2016 Abortions as Clinton accepts them is unacceptable partial birth abortions........really!!!??? The problem on both sides is the extremes they accept. RE: Trump for president - ZEROSPHERES - 10-20-2016 |