03-29-2011, 03:12 PM
(03-29-2011, 03:05 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:(03-29-2011, 02:44 PM)rothschild Wrote: It's not a "conspiracy theory" that NIST can't provide a scientifically credible explanation for the collapse of WTC 7. It's a fact.
Three things brought down building seven, structural damage, fire and gravity.
What do you think caused it to collapse? controlled demolition?, it takes weeks to set up demolition charges to bring down a building the size of WTC 7.
The explanation NIST provided for it's conclusion re the collapse of WTC 7 has been proven to be scientifically fraudulent and NIST has thus far failed to modify it's conclusion or provide a scientifically credible explanation for it.
Would it take weeks to set wireless charges?