07-23-2023, 12:05 PM
(07-22-2023, 01:52 PM)rothschild Wrote: How is "the populous" -- which is rife with divisions -- of serious consequence when they're dependant on corporations for their survival -- which is, and will continue to be, leveraged for maximum coercion?
I reject your premise that dependency on corporations is the catalyst to establish the new Global Order . . . and, thus, achieving a docile and compliant global population.
Additionally, your premise paints all corporations as being the same.
You do not distinguish between their composition (e.g., closed, public, non-profit, municipal, business), nor what would cause them to “join” with the elitists.
However, you just identified (and according to your premise) a potential and critical “moving part”, but fail to give any explanation to why, once a country controls all the corporations, they would now yield this incredible power and control, to another?
Convince me and I’ll jump on board.
If "too many moving parts" is indeed a fact, perhaps you could quantify it and provide a brief explanation of why they're an insurmountable obstacle.
Ahhhh . . . the old do as I say, and be specific . . . but not as I do . . . by tossing lofty theories and prognostications without support.
OK!
We’ll start with an easy question illustrating “moving parts”: What would unite different countries into abandoning their individual cultures, religions, political structures, and governance, and not only welcome, but embrace a new monolithic Global Government?
Let’s think micro and approach this, by applying the same question, to the United States.
Give me an example that would unite all of America’s population into abandoning our current government in favor of a new Global World Order.
Easier still . . . why haven’t we unified our population into one unified and acceptable mindset . . . regarding anything that divides us?
As we haven’t found a solution, domestically, to resolve our divisions, it is absurd to ignore this “moving part” before postulating an international resolve.
Remember, it must be for all . . . lest now you have “tribes” rejecting and threatening the New Global Order and their allies.
This segues directly into your next point . . .
The only major obstacle I see is the obedience of subordinates in the globalist hierarchy, hence the need for characterizing it's behavior as "emergency management". They're subject to coercion, reprisal, and if necessary, replacement.
Is that an insurmountable obstacle? Perhaps, but it certainly wasn't in the case of Nazi Germany.
And how did that work long term? What thwarted and derailed the grand design of a pure-blooded Aryan Nation, ruling the world?
Quite simply: Why did it fail and what is preventing the same failure from happening again?
And then there’s your unresolved “obedience of subordinates” obstacle to overcome, too.
Global domination, other than by force?
Simple: End tribalism by creating fear, and then providing a universally accepted solution to waylay the fear.
The rest of the journey is just the devil in details.