ISRAEL VS. PALESTINE...AGAIN

[rothschild]

Dude.

If a cop started assaulting your wife, would you suck it up and do nothing while your wife got the shit beaten out of her?

Asking for a friend.

My friend said:  "If you're in an unhappy relationship, pray for a full-on George Floyd event.  It's cheaper than a divorce."

He's single.

And then he said:  "If Hamas was using your family as human shields, would you suck it up and do nothing?"

Given the circumstances, I'd hold the IDF responsible because the "human shields" excuse is a canard that has no bearing on the applicable international law -- law that Israel and it's enablers refuse to be held to. Hamas should be held to account as well.

Israel refuses to settle the conflict on the basis of international law, opting instead to deal with it as a matter of "internal security". In either case human rights apply.

The Palestinians are not in a position to flout international law. Only Israel has that privilege, and it takes full advantage of it. Eliminate the moral hazard and the behavior would quickly change.

Do you support the rule of law, or do you support moral hazard?