05-03-2011, 11:13 AM
(05-03-2011, 06:57 AM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:(05-02-2011, 10:21 PM)username Wrote: I don't necessarily give credence to the nuclear bomb threat but interestingly, it sounds like what WASN'T said under torture led them to Osama. Apparently Khalid (or others) refused to name the courier (who ultimately led us to Osama) citing that he was unimportant. The absence of information about that person led us to dig deeper and voila.
Uh-huh, they've tortured people who were later released without charge why would they want to torture one of the masterminds of Al Qaeda?
You believe they didn't torture him because they said they didn't?
I have some "magic" beans I would like to sell you, PM me.
You need to work on your reading comprehension this morning. I didn't say they didn't torture; I said they garnered information from what WASN'T said under torture (i.e., during the torture that was being committed).
Moot point. The news keeps coming out and I read this morning that they got the courier's name from someone supposedly a month or two after they stopped torturing the guy.
Fine print for OP: I don't necessarily believe or disbelieve the above information obtained from my local newspaper.
Commando Cunt Queen