04-08-2013, 01:46 PM
(04-07-2013, 11:11 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Personally, if I was under suspicion, I wouldn't take a LDT, except in two cases where I'd be demanding it:
1. My child or someone I loved was missing or killed and I needed to be ruled out so police could move forward.
2. I was innocent and accused of a serious crime, with all the cards stacked against me and nothing to lose.
Absolutely.
However, I wasn't suggesting that Arias request the poly . . . or her lawyers.
This was for the "experts".
To my knowledge, neither Spamuels nor LaVoyeur bolstered their conclusions by stating her statements were confirmed by an independent polygraph and not solely based on the definitive "statements consistent with others who . . ." mantra.
They never wanted confirmation of her statements.
The truth would jeopardize a guaranteed healthy payout and publicity.
Bloggers inside the courtroom are posting in and out of chamber's happenings.
LaViolette in and out. Detective Flores in and out.