09-12-2015, 09:35 PM
(09-12-2015, 09:11 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: ...I haven't seen any evidence of wrong-doing or illegality on the part of Hillary Clinton and so I'm not assuming it exists because some people imagine wrong-doing or illegality must have occurred. However, should something more than unsubstantiated suspicion be presented, I'll consider it at that time.
And, as I've noted several times in this thread - I believe that Clinton should have used the government server for work emails, even though it wasn't required. I think she, of all people, should have foreseen that choosing to use a personal email for work would be used as ammunition against her by her detractors, even if she violated no policies and broke no laws in so doing. Further, I think it would have been better for her if she'd proactively addressed the allegations immediately, seriously, and firmly -- thereby avoiding the later failed attempt at humor and the cornered apology. I think she and her camp have managed the controversy poorly.
Selective vision? Straw man?
It is not about personal email account; it is about her decision to use her own server.
A clear violation of federal law occurred; please see my last post for more detail.
If Petraeus was guilty so is she