11-03-2018, 07:42 AM
I will stand. The email bullshit she pulled should have seen her behind bars and has seen lesser crimes put people behind bars.
As for the Uranium One, the problem is NOT conspiracy but rather something a little different. What it is is people making allegations from connecting aspects of a deal. Some have more basis or stronger premises than others but to dismiss them completely (whether they are right or wrong) as conspiracy theories would be really silly and I think a little dishonest.
Where did the Uranium go? Is it true it was trucked out of America and into Canada and then out of Canada? Where did it go from there? Russia? Iran? Does anyone know? Does the fact that no one knows concern anyone?
Was there stakes held in the Russian company that were non-disclosed by members of Clinton's party? Does that matter?
Did people connected to Uranium One or who may be beneficiaries of Uranium One give vast sums to Clinton?
Was there investigations in the companies who were beneficiaries of the contract and what was found?
Once you get these facts on the ground and see allegations about the people that were a party to the signing of the Uranium One deal, then these conspiracy theories seem based on something and that the concern is real. How viable any of these premises are will differ. But there are grounds behind the speculation and real concern.
As for the Uranium One, the problem is NOT conspiracy but rather something a little different. What it is is people making allegations from connecting aspects of a deal. Some have more basis or stronger premises than others but to dismiss them completely (whether they are right or wrong) as conspiracy theories would be really silly and I think a little dishonest.
Where did the Uranium go? Is it true it was trucked out of America and into Canada and then out of Canada? Where did it go from there? Russia? Iran? Does anyone know? Does the fact that no one knows concern anyone?
Was there stakes held in the Russian company that were non-disclosed by members of Clinton's party? Does that matter?
Did people connected to Uranium One or who may be beneficiaries of Uranium One give vast sums to Clinton?
Was there investigations in the companies who were beneficiaries of the contract and what was found?
Once you get these facts on the ground and see allegations about the people that were a party to the signing of the Uranium One deal, then these conspiracy theories seem based on something and that the concern is real. How viable any of these premises are will differ. But there are grounds behind the speculation and real concern.