Posts: 85,194
Threads: 2,913
Joined: Jun 2008
Would a shut down of this movie be considered censorship?
Director Kathryn Bigelow hasn't yet called "action" on her movie about the capture of Osama bin Laden, but the project is already stirring up controversy. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, sent a letter to the CIA and the Department of Defense on Tuesday asking for an investigation into whether the White House has granted Bigelow and Sony Pictures access to confidential information for the project.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2...movie.html
Posts: 7,409
Threads: 69
Joined: Oct 2010
(08-11-2011, 02:46 PM)Duchess Wrote:
Would a shut down of this movie be considered censorship?
What is unacceptable about the movie?
Is Bin Laden caught eating a Jimmy Dean Sausage Biscuit?
Posts: 85,194
Threads: 2,913
Joined: Jun 2008
Apparently a Congressman is concerned that Katherine & her partner on this film may have been given access to information that shouldn't be made public. He wants the CIA & DHS to investigate.
Posts: 7,409
Threads: 69
Joined: Oct 2010
I'm bettin' it's because Obama will look like a leader and a hero.
Hello, Second Term!
Follow the money.
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
It is the information part and it's expected release date, just prior to the 2012 election that has heads turning.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 7,409
Threads: 69
Joined: Oct 2010
I hope they don't show the killing or dumping the body of Bin Laden.
We're better than that.
Don't want to piss off our peaceful Muslim brothers and sisters.
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
I don't know how that will be reconciled, we couldn't see the factual information, but we will be able to see the information in a biased movie.
Tiki step away from the crack pipe.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 7,409
Threads: 69
Joined: Oct 2010
(08-11-2011, 03:12 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I don't know how that will be reconciled . . .
And featuring - George W. Bush as
Osama Bin Laden.
Barney Frank would fuck Pelosi on the Capital steps if Hollywood could ink that deal.
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
She is probably close enough to being a man frank wouldn't know the difference.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 85,194
Threads: 2,913
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,939
Threads: 392
Joined: Jun 2008
(08-11-2011, 02:46 PM)Duchess Wrote:
Would a shut down of this movie be considered censorship?
Director Kathryn Bigelow hasn't yet called "action" on her movie about the capture of Osama bin Laden, but the project is already stirring up controversy. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, sent a letter to the CIA and the Department of Defense on Tuesday asking for an investigation into whether the White House has granted Bigelow and Sony Pictures access to confidential information for the project.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2...movie.html
Jesus Christ theres no time like the present is there?
They could at least wait until the bottom feeders are finished sucking the flesh from Bin Ladens boney corpse.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Posts: 16,499
Threads: 188
Joined: Dec 2009
Hmmm, Sony entertainment wants to make a movie about Osama and they're consulting with government to try to be as accurate as possible (I'm sure it's not the first time that that's been done).
Unless they can show that there's been some impropriety, disclosure of classified information or that it's somehow harmful to national security (beyond the fact that it might help Obama get re-elected) then yeah, I think it would be censorship.
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
(08-12-2011, 07:00 PM)username Wrote: Hmmm, Sony entertainment wants to make a movie about Osama and they're consulting with government to try to be as accurate as possible (I'm sure it's not the first time that that's been done).
Unless they can show that there's been some impropriety, disclosure of classified information or that it's somehow harmful to national security (beyond the fact that it might help Obama get re-elected) then yeah, I think it would be censorship.
How much information was the public allowed to have?
We paid for the raid lock stock and barrel and we were not allowed to have any of the inside info.
Fuck Hollywood.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
![[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]](https://i.imgur.com/Zy3rKpW.png)
