Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Father uses Dog coller to shock his kids.
#1
Father uses dog collar to shock kids.




The Salem man faces four charges of mistreatment .


A Salem man was arrested Tuesday for putting an electric dog collar on each of his four children and shocking them.
Todd Marcum, 41, said he did it "because he thought it was funny," Salem Police Lt. Dave Okada said.
The four children, ages 3, 6, 8 and 9, had been shocked while wearing the collar at least once, according to a statement from their father, Okada said.
Marcum told police that he would chase the 3-year-old boy around with the collar, making him cry at the thought of being shocked. Okada said that because of the boy's behavior, it is likely that the children were shocked more than once.
Oregon Department of Human Services workers on Tuesday summoned police to Marcum's Salem home.
Marcum was taken into custody on four charges of first-degree criminal mistreatment. He is in the Marion County jail.
The four children were left in the custody of their mother, Okada said. The case has been handed over to DHS.
Dog shock collars are used in training and to control barking, said John Seroczynski, the national sales manager for D.T. Systems.
The Dallas, Texas, company manufactures the electronic collars.
It is unknown whether the collar used on the children was made by D.T. Systems.
"There's not one collar made today that can actually burn a dog or a person," Seroczynski said.
Most collars are powered by a 9-volt battery and don't produce a large enough shock to injure a person, he said. Seroczynski said it was not likely that the children were seriously injured.
"He definitely would not have hurt them to the point that it would have damaged any organs or caused them to be hospitalized," he said.
The charge of one collar is less powerful than that of a Taser, such as the kind used by police, he said.
Seroczynski said the collars are not to be used on humans.
"Regardless of what your kids are like, it's sure not going to cure any behavioral problems," he said. "Bottom line is, what he did was dead wrong."





Fuck::bang::i've fucked up the title again:Blush: .
I would stop eating chocolate.. but I'm not a quitter!








:B
Reply
#2
So it's okay to use on dogs but it's a criminal act to use on children, huh?

Fucking crybabies... I'd give 'em something to cry about.
Reply
#3
LuMPyPussy Wrote:So it's okay to use on dogs but it's a criminal act to use on children, huh?

Fucking crybabies... I'd give 'em something to cry about
You know there's no way i would use it on my dog (but i'd like to use it on him)
The guy thought it was funny ...i wonder what else he thinks is funny.::bang::
I would stop eating chocolate.. but I'm not a quitter!








:B
Reply
#4
I think they should mount it on his cock, and give him random jolts. Fucking sicko.
Reply
#5
What a sick fuck!

Now I'm not one of those who says that corporal punishment (within reason) shouldn't be used if need be but, this witless fuck needs to be strung up by the balls and never allowed near children again.

Smack the kid on the butt......yes.

Smack on the back of the hand (not too hard)......yes.

Light swat across the mouth.......yes (very carefully)

That shit? NO WAY!!!!!!
[Image: alcatraz-prison-picture2-1.jpg]
[Image: what_manner.gif]
Reply
#6
HMMMM, Cause he thought it was funny? Why the hell would you think it's funny to make your kids jump and scream? Fucker, I would like stick the tazer up his ass and turn it on .. now that shit would be funny.
Reply
#7
I tazed myself by accident once. It was pretty funny.
Reply