Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lance Armstrong
#81
SOL has ran out on most the law suits.
Reply
#82
(01-15-2013, 11:28 PM)Tammy75 Wrote: SOL has ran out on most the law suits.

No. Not really. Maybe a perjury charge but he still is subject to numerous civil litigations.
Commando Cunt Queen
Reply
#83


It's said that he's worth around a hundred million and could stand to lose half of it if he confesses.

I still don't think he's going to confess. He'll own that he treated people like shit and say he has let a lot of people down but I doubt he'll say he was pumping EPO or any other performance enhancing drug into himself.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#84
On the news this morning it said he did confess to using EPO's, blood transfusions, cortizone, and some other stuff. But Oprah said it was not the confression she was hoping for.
Devil Money Stealing Aunt Smiley_emoticons_fies
Reply
#85
I'm eating crow. Nom Nom Nom

I just saw Lance admit to it all. Doping, cheating, lying.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#86
Whoa. I was at a school board meeting. Probably just as well. I wasn't interested in seeing him grovel but I am interested in the summaries.
Commando Cunt Queen
Reply
#87
I'm wondering if Lance is glad or sad that Manti Te'o took him off the front page.
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
#88
(01-18-2013, 12:01 AM)username Wrote: I wasn't interested in seeing him grovel


I didn't see any groveling but I didn't watch the entire interview either, I saw about the first 10 min., it happened right away and it happened fast. This isn't verbatim but Oprah said, these are yes or no questions, let's get right to it and bang, bang, bang, she asked the questions and he repeatedly said yes with one of the last questions being, would you have won the Tour De France seven times in a row without doping and he finally said a no, not in my opinion.

I thought he looked relaxed, he didn't appear contrite just matter of fact but again I only watched a few minutes of it.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#89
Dummies

A day before the USADA made its edict official, Armstrong revealed that he wouldn't fight the ban everyone knew was coming.

In response, one of his supporters, Robert Hutchins, a resident of Sandy, Utah, who'd already sent a couple of nasty e-mails to the USADA the previous month, let fly with this:

Travis Tygert [sic], Hope you have body guards and bullet proof vest, your [sic] a dead man mother fucker. You just don't know what you've done!!! Your ass is fucked.

Then there is this one fired at Tygart by Gerritt Keats, a doctor (!) living in Florida. Here's what Keats sent last October under the subject line "Nazi tragic Tygart:"

What part of a positive test are you and your Nazi filth of an organization to [sic] corrupt and stupid to understand? You filthy witch hunters hounded a man for 30 years and tested him hundreds of times. Guilty until proven innocent. Travis Tygart is a fucking pig who should be nailed to a tree and skinned while he watches his toady staff and filthy children being castrated. I hope one day to meet Turdface Tygart. The greatest service I could do to mankind is kill that fucking pig. Mr. Armstrong is an outstanding, superior American unlike the filty that has contaminated this once great country. No doubt the USADA are faithful Obama supporters.

Guilty until proven innocent Your [sic] are to good so you must have doped. Mr [sic] Tygart is a disgusting twice digested sac of shit and his filthy staff, the USADA should be shot on site [sic]. A positive drug test is admonition [sic] of guilt, not a negative one you assholes.

Hundreds of negative tests excpet [sic] for one for salve for his ass. I only wish Armstrong were black then the DOJ and all the rest of the racists would be on your asses like white on rice.

I hope all you filthy pigs scream for a week before you die, just before you have watched your degenerate children do the same thing. I hope the Nazi traitor bitch reading this email rots in hell.


Armstrong's later confession that he'd doped up for his entire career must have been a bitter pill for these two gullible hot-heads.

Both have now pleaded guilty to sending threatening communications over the Internet, a crime that carries a maximum of five years in prison and up to a $250,000 fine. Keats is scheduled for sentencing in January, Hutchins in February.

Ref:
http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/201...strong.php
Reply
#90
Its amazing what lengths some people will go to to defend the honour of a no good serial cheating piece of fucking shit like Armstrong. Everything he achieved in his life has been fatally undermined for the rest of human history and rightfully so.

Fuck him.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Reply
#91
(11-09-2013, 02:46 PM)Cynical Ninja Wrote: Its amazing what lengths some people will go to to defend the honour of a no good serial cheating piece of fucking shit like Armstrong. Everything he achieved in his life has been fatally undermined for the rest of human history and rightfully so.

Fuck him.

I don't know on enhancement drugs or without he is still a good athlete and could most likely bend you over and "fuck you" Wait till Chinas genetically modified athletes start hitting the stage. That's when things will get hot.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
#92
“Bend me over and fuck me?”. You really need to keep your sexual fantasies to yourself maggotyboo, I mean the thought of Lance Armstrong balls deep in my anus obviously appeals to you but this is best kept private in your own personal wankbank.

If Armstrong tried to fuck me I'd just kick him swiftly in his one remaining gonad.

As for drug cheats in sport guess which country leads the way in drug cheats? The good old US of A where the question isn't which baseball sluggers are on steroids but which ones aren't?
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Reply
#93
Whether to express support, opposition, indifference.... of Lance Armstrong or anyone else, it's seriously gullible to address electronic communications directly to someone - specifically describing how you want to kill them - and believe that you're not likely to wind up in some trouble.

Even if Hutchins and Keats had been right about Armstrong, the hotheads would potentially be looking at years behind bars and hundreds of thousands in fines. Dummies.

It's gotta suck even worse to have been proven wrong and be facing such serious consequences.

Anyway, interested to see what sentences they receive early next year. I don't think they'll get the max, but authorities are cracking down harder on direct threats made electronically, so who knows.
Reply
#94
For sure. If you want to get rid of someone just do it and don't just threaten, have they no shame!
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
#95
(11-11-2013, 12:58 PM)Maggot Wrote: For sure. If you want to get rid of someone just do it and don't just threaten, have they no shame!

Exactly - amateurs!

Do it, and then slip out the back, jack - just get yourself free.

I bet these guys were all talk and weren't serious in their threats to kill Tygart, but making death threats is against the law, whether they turn out to be serious or not. Don't know why, but it kinda surprises me that a doctor would be so ignorant.
Reply