+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Personal Member Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-5.html)
+--- Forum: Daily Greeting BS (https://mockforums.net/forum-13.html)
+--- Thread: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES (/thread-8953.html)
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - HairOfTheDog - 03-22-2013
(03-22-2013, 08:04 AM)Duchess Wrote:
Only a tard would attempt to register by proxy every. fucking. day. Tard.
For some reason, this is really funny to me.
This isn't a pathetic PI troll site where member registration info is unguarded.
If this lurker wants in so badly, why doesn't he/she just register without a proxy, like everyone else?
Super secret internet message board spy mission whose headquarters could be traced by IP? As if Admin here gives a single shit.
Or, maybe it's someone whose been banned and won't stop until he/she penetrates the wall! Ah, sweet revenge!
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Duchess - 03-22-2013
(03-22-2013, 09:10 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: If this lurker wants in so badly, why doesn't he/she just register without a proxy, like everyone else?
On average we get about a dozen people a day who attempt to register by proxy & then there are those who register and leave or those who register and then email me wanting to know why they are banned when they never posted a word. They aren't even smart enough to realize they are in Purgatory with a sticky thread that reads, NEWBIES, READ THIS FIRST, you can't miss it and it tells them what they need to do, all I ask is that they start an intro thread and if they are legit I move them immediately into the newbie forum where y'all can have your way with them, one out of maybe every ten people comprehend that. I do try not to mock their stupidity, I don't want to run them off but really I don't think we want anyone who can't understand a very simple concept.
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Midwest Spy - 03-22-2013
You're a gracious hostess and yes, there are more idiots than not cruising cyberspace.
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - HairOfTheDog - 03-22-2013
I know you welcome everyone who's legit, Duchess, without catering to morons.
It's the ones who keep trying to get in the same way and being denied access over and over that crack me up.
I imagine a lot of head-shaking and eye-rolling on your part. Same shit, different day.
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Duchess - 03-22-2013
(03-22-2013, 09:27 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I know you welcome everyone who's legit, Duchess, without catering to morons.
It's the ones who keep trying to get in the same way and being denied access over and over that crack me up.
I imagine a lot of head-shaking and eye-rolling on your part. Same shit, different day.
Oh yeah, much snickering going on. I tend to compare nOObs to all of you too, I probably shouldn't do that but y'all have set the standard for what I think is acceptable.
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Jimbone - 03-22-2013
The screening process involved here should be put into practice for voting. Look at how it weeds out the bottom feeders (for the most part).
We'd be much better off. Really.
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Duchess - 03-22-2013
(03-22-2013, 10:34 AM)Jimbone Wrote: The screening process involved here should be put into practice for voting.
Wouldn't that be awesome! I'd be agreeable to something like that, I think it would be a huge improvement.
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Jimbone - 03-22-2013
It'd probably be better if only landowners could vote actually, as long as we are screwing with things
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Duchess - 03-22-2013
Define screwing.
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Jimbone - 03-22-2013
You're tempting me, aren't you
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Duchess - 03-22-2013
RE: WAVE TO THE BITCHFLAKES - Duchess - 07-02-2013
Well Well Well
You do know that lurking can constitute eavesdropping, right?
Being nosy is a character flaw.