Presidential race 2016 - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: Presidential race 2016 (/thread-10229.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
|
RE: Presidential race 2016 - ZEROSPHERES - 10-26-2016 RE: Presidential race 2016 - Donovan - 10-26-2016 Of course there's that whole troubling lack of evidence of criminal wrongdoing and no conviction. Etc. But hey, as long as we're discarding the results of a very thorough and expensive due process in favor of dubiously sourced emails, let's just accuse her of all sorts of wacky shit! The Patterson film? Hillary. Roswell? Hillary. Bilderberg? Fuckin Hillary. Christ. RE: Presidential race 2016 - Duchess - 10-27-2016 Some Republicans are already talking about impeaching her before she is even elected...because of course they have nothing better to do. They also want to investigate the investigations. When's the last time those lazy bastards actually worked? RE: Presidential race 2016 - ZEROSPHERES - 10-28-2016 (10-26-2016, 09:19 PM)Donovan Wrote: Of course there's that whole troubling lack of evidence of criminal wrongdoing and no conviction. Etc. But hey, as long as we're discarding the results of a very thorough and expensive due process in favor of dubiously sourced emails, let's just accuse her of all sorts of wacky shit! The Patterson film? Hillary. Roswell? Hillary. Bilderberg? Fuckin Hillary. Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/fbi-reopens-clinton-email-server-investigation-230454#ixzz4OPOvjNXf Looks like Anthony Weiner my have exacted revenge on Hillary without even knowing it. RE: Presidential race 2016 - Maggot - 10-29-2016 The front pocket media is sitting on their hands on this one. RE: Presidential race 2016 - Duchess - 10-30-2016 (10-29-2016, 12:50 PM)Maggot Wrote: The front pocket media is sitting on their hands on this one. What do you mean? Are you saying it isn't being reported on by the media? If that's the case, I can tell you it is, it's in the print media, it's being reported on network television, cable news networks and it's all over the internet. I'm a political news junkie, I follow this shit daily, it's everywhere. RE: Presidential race 2016 - Duchess - 10-30-2016 Why are Hillary & Trump our best choices? Anyone care to take a shot at answering that? RE: Presidential race 2016 - Maggot - 10-30-2016 We made them so we deserve them. RE: Presidential race 2016 - ZEROSPHERES - 10-30-2016 RE: Presidential race 2016 - pyropappy - 10-30-2016 (10-30-2016, 01:52 PM)Duchess Wrote: An uneducated lackadaisical electorate. Thank your local big government progressive. RE: Presidential race 2016 - BlueTiki - 10-31-2016 They are just our choices . . . period. There is no SAT for prez. RE: Presidential race 2016 - Duchess - 10-31-2016 (10-31-2016, 03:01 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: There is no SAT for prez. None for raising kids either. RE: Presidential race 2016 - Duchess - 11-01-2016 So...the FBI has concluded that Russia has worked to undermine our election but Director Comey thought it was too close to the election to say so publicly even though there is evidence to support that claim, instead, with no evidence whatsoever, he choose to release the fact Huma's emails are on Anthony's laptop but he doesn't know what they contain. RE: Presidential race 2016 - Carsman - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 05:26 AM)Duchess Wrote: Someone may be looking for a new job soon! RE: Presidential race 2016 - Duchess - 11-01-2016 There are now 3 Senators pledging to keep any Clinton nominated judge off the court. This is no way to manage our country. RE: Presidential race 2016 - Maggot - 11-01-2016 Only 97 more to go. Wait...........only 48 more to go. RE: Presidential race 2016 - BlueTiki - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 05:26 AM)Duchess Wrote: Whoa, whoa, whoa . . . That info was released on or about 3 October. Without the FBI's involvement, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued an early October statement saying the "US intelligence community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations ... These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process." The former official said that Comey agreed with the conclusion that other prominent US intelligence sources came to. "A foreign power was trying to undermine the election," the source said. "He believed it to be true, but was against putting it out before the election ... if it is said, it shouldn't come from the FBI, which as you'll recall it did not." Homeland and ODNI's never expanded on or provided conclusions regarding the "intended to interfere with the US election process" statement. However, the Clinton campaign readily, eagerly and by innuendo tied Trump to this hack and release. It was fearmongering . . . plain and simple. I personally don't believe new "classified" emails will surface. In fact, I don't believe this is a direct attack on Hillary, by the FBI. I believe this one is on Huma . . . a woman who DID participate in the classification briefing and HER failure to protect sensitive information. She was granted immunity and stated she turned over all devices containing any potential sensitive info. If this proves to be false AND she was appointed by Clinton to a ranking position, she could expose Hillary to a "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" impeachment proceeding. Stupid and careless hired help! At least Trump fired his bastards when the spotlight was on them . . . months before the government's release of "Russian influence". RE: Presidential race 2016 - Duchess - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 02:14 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: That info was released on or about 3 October. Yes, but it was recently (maybe yesterday?) reported that the FBI didn't want their name associated with the release of that information. RE: Presidential race 2016 - BlueTiki - 11-01-2016 (11-01-2016, 03:07 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-01-2016, 02:14 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: That info was released on or about 3 October. Yup. It appears the FBI wasn't the lead investigative agency concerning the "Russian Hack". And "Yes" . . . it has also been reported that he agreed with the conclusion. But they released the "Russian Hack" info in spite of his concern. And not a word of protest from the WH or Loretta "How are the grandkids, Bill" Lynch. Or the DNC. Payback is a bitch and her stripper name is Karma. RE: Presidential race 2016 - HairOfTheDog - 11-02-2016 (11-01-2016, 11:18 AM)Duchess Wrote: I heard John McCain say that the Republicans wouldn't consider any Clinton nominee a few days ago. I like McCain alright most of the time, so that disappointed and surprised me a little coming from him. It's asinine. Republican Senators have refused to consider Obama's reasonable nominee, Garland, for months on end -- leaving us with an even number of Justices and a crippled court. If the Republican Senators continue to put their personal and party butthurt above doing their jobs according to the Constitution by refusing to consider a Clinton nominee too, I think the Senate will lose its Republican majority in a landslide (as it should be). |