I'm spoiling for a fight.

[cladking]

The whole thing sounds pretty absurd to a lot of people and there are a few weak points in this theory.

But if you really think about it the orthodox ideas are far more absurd. We're supposed to believe they have a moutain of facts and informatyion that these were tombs built with ramps and there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever they were built with ramps and no conclusive evidence they were tombs. This is really pretty remarkable that these things can all be true.

First off there is no mountain of evidence. This is a tall tale they give to everyone who comes up with an alternative idea. Believe it or not there isn't a single surviving piece of papyrus with writing from the time of great pyramid building. They've created mountains of orthodox writing and it's all founded on the assumption that these must have been tombs built with ramps. The Pyramid Texts were carved into the walls of later pyramids and are known to be of much older origin. The great pyramid builders wrote these and they specifically said that these were not tombs. They said it over and over and in many different ways but orthodoxy has chosen to interpret the literal meaning right out of them. We know the different job titles of the builders and they are not at all consistent with ramps or any primitive means of building them.

They said to build pyramids they needed to get out the boats and ropes and ladders. This is exactly what the job titles are consistent with. In the workmen's cemetery only a single job title is known and this is "Overseer of the Boats of Neith". He's not a ramp builder or a foreman with a whip, he oversees the operation of the southern ascender whose deity was Neith. The western counterweight was Isis while the eastern ascender was Nephthys.

None of the evidence fits Orthodox assumptions. No one has ever been able to devise a ramp system that could deliver a 2 ¹⁄₂ ton stone every 60 seconds to an altitude of 120' which would be requied to build. I can hardly even imagine a 480' tall ramp and can't imagine anyone with the courage to try to drag a stone up it. It would have required a sustained effort of 55 Horse Power for 20 years to build this and if it were all on ramps there's no plauisible way to get the number of men required to fit on a ramp. This isn't so much to say it's impossible as that it is wholly uneviodenced and inconsistent with the physical evidence that does exist. It flies in the face of human nature. People simply would refuse to build a giant headstone for a dead king to knock about in at night. If by some chance they actually did it they wouldn't then say that it wasn't a tomb.

To me it's obvious from the evidence these were very sophisticated and intelligent people. They were all scientists and Imhotep was the chief of observers. They acted sophisticated and left evidence of it. The alternative is to believe sun addled lunatics as painted by Egyptology were capable of building something so fine and enormous as G1. At least my theory is internally consistent, consistent with the evidence, and consistent with literal meaning of the words of the builders.

Egyptology has buthchered the meaning of their words because they insist on projecting later ideas and language back onto the pyramid builders. It is insulting to them and I have no doubt they are spinning in their graves.