03-22-2011, 08:23 PM
(03-22-2011, 03:08 AM)BlueTiki Wrote: No.
Laymens terms.
Universal = absolute or pertaining to ALL members of a group
Existential = pertaining to at least one member of a group - BUT NOT ALL
Very good, Tiki. Glad to see you're no longer equating "not all" as being 1. You're learning.
(03-22-2011, 03:08 AM)BlueTiki Wrote: "Liberal Moral Faggots" - is this an entire group or a subset of "X"?
If a subset of "X": name "X". ("X" being an unnamed population)
Jeezus . . . defend your statements with some reference to conventional logic terms and not with feeble retorts attempting to appear "deep".
Hell . . . classical or contemporary . . . I don't care. Just be consistent.
Or use a calculus equation and define the variables and the order of the steps.
Okay . . . I'm dishonest . . . I'm lazy.
It's your Hypothesis . . . you do the work.
Give it up. You're babbling, scrambling and rewording.
(03-22-2011, 03:08 AM)BlueTiki Wrote: "Liberal Moral Faggots" . . . still makes me chuckle.
I wish I could think of one!
How about all the libs who support affirmative action? If that isn't phony morality then what is?