01-14-2012, 06:44 PM
God, talk about butt hurt. It's always such a dramatic overreaction with you. The conversation went like this:
kshores: that was disturbing.
Me: Was it my goatse reference? That might have been a little over the top. But then I'm apparently a psycho so how far is too far? Points to ponder.
Cracker: I already did the goatse thing here. It isn't the conent, it is the delivery. (huh?)
Me: I'll make sure to read and memorize all your posts before commenting on a famous meme, I wouldn't want to plagiarize you. (My response since it appeared you were saying you had already done the goatse thing. Oh, that's right. You DID say that. Then what's your fucking point?)
And we're off on another Cracker crackhead meltdown...
Cracker: That wasn't a slam. Unless you are a menopausal egocentric shutin that can't accept constructive criticism because you built your life on platitudes and wishes. I was actually supporting you for the use of goatse. But you didn't "hear" that part because you have thin skin (which is a common malady for those who suffer from an enduring lack of physical human contact. cat fur is soft. over time, that breaks down your body's natural ability to withstand the touch of men).
Cracker doesn't do egg shells.
Me: Forgive me, I didn't realize "It isn't the conent, it is the delivery." was constructive criticism since I don't know that the fuck conent means. Is that an algebraic term?
And you can pound egg shells up your withered ass as far as I'm concerned.
I'm still not sure how "it isn't the content (?), it is the delivery" is constructive criticism, particularly when you couldn't be bothered to explain what the fuck you're talking about. Or proofread. Some pithy little (misspelled) sentence isn't helpful if you actually were offering some kind of helpful suggestion.
Dunno if you lurked when Moose was here but you come across as his slightly tranquilized older sister. That isn't a good thing. I hope this helps... this is offered as constructive criticism as well.
kshores: that was disturbing.
Me: Was it my goatse reference? That might have been a little over the top. But then I'm apparently a psycho so how far is too far? Points to ponder.
Cracker: I already did the goatse thing here. It isn't the conent, it is the delivery. (huh?)
Me: I'll make sure to read and memorize all your posts before commenting on a famous meme, I wouldn't want to plagiarize you. (My response since it appeared you were saying you had already done the goatse thing. Oh, that's right. You DID say that. Then what's your fucking point?)
And we're off on another Cracker crackhead meltdown...
Cracker: That wasn't a slam. Unless you are a menopausal egocentric shutin that can't accept constructive criticism because you built your life on platitudes and wishes. I was actually supporting you for the use of goatse. But you didn't "hear" that part because you have thin skin (which is a common malady for those who suffer from an enduring lack of physical human contact. cat fur is soft. over time, that breaks down your body's natural ability to withstand the touch of men).
Cracker doesn't do egg shells.
Me: Forgive me, I didn't realize "It isn't the conent, it is the delivery." was constructive criticism since I don't know that the fuck conent means. Is that an algebraic term?
And you can pound egg shells up your withered ass as far as I'm concerned.
I'm still not sure how "it isn't the content (?), it is the delivery" is constructive criticism, particularly when you couldn't be bothered to explain what the fuck you're talking about. Or proofread. Some pithy little (misspelled) sentence isn't helpful if you actually were offering some kind of helpful suggestion.
Dunno if you lurked when Moose was here but you come across as his slightly tranquilized older sister. That isn't a good thing. I hope this helps... this is offered as constructive criticism as well.