05-18-2012, 08:10 PM
(05-18-2012, 07:48 PM)Adub Wrote: How in the hell does "no prior relationship" support a self-defense? Trayvon did not know Zimmerman. Had no beef with him. Zimmerman was a fucking stranger.
On the otherhand, Zimmerman's imagination zeroed in on Trayvon as being one and the same as the young black guys that his wife had witnessed committing crimes. Give me a fucking break. And Cracker STFU. Trayvon was hunted down by Zimmerman because Zimmerman imagined that he was going to catch the bad guy. And help out LE. And it didn't quite work out that way because Zimmerman had it all fucking wrong.
Okay. First things first. Prior relationships can either be benign or combative. With a prior relationship, one has past experience(s) as to the person's actions or behaviors. Neither Martin nor Zimmerman knew how each other would react be it passive or violent based on a lack of history.
Apparently, Martin had no idea that Zimmerman was a "hunter" looking for a trophy and Zimmerman had no idea that Martin was to be the next martyr for the Civil Rights Movement after his mixed-race ass was beaten and then shooting him dead. Obviously, Martin wasn't too bright about many things. If he only saw Zimmerman as "stranger" after George allegedly "hunted" him then he was a dumbshit. By all means, change "dumbshit" to "trusting" if you like.
Unfortunately, I don't believe your scenario will be proven at the criminal trial. You've got nothing but speculation and conjecture. However, your scenario at the civil suit will set the grieving parents up for life. Economic justice.
"All the kids with the pumped up kicks better run, run, run . . ."