06-01-2012, 07:39 PM
(05-31-2012, 09:58 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: I saw your reference above, suspension is not the same as revocation. IF he is convicted he will no doubt fave revocation of his CCP along with jail time, fines and all that. If he is not convicted then he will most likely have his CCP reinstated (not guilty, didn't do it, innocent), IF it has in fact been suspended.
T was an idiot, and IF Z did in fact tell T that he was neighborhood watch while T was despensing the ass whooping Z got, I seriously doubt T would have listened to or respected that declaration.
The Law may concider T to have been unarmed, it also does not require an attacker to be armed with a conventional weapon during an attack to justify use of deadly force. Fists and feet can be used to inflict grevious bodily harm and reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony.
Last note, Z is innocent until proven guilty, his CCP should not be revoked until that is decided.
You stated that Martin was "far from ... unarmed."
You were wrong. Now you try to cover your mistake by substituting helpless or not dangerous for the meaning of the word of "unarmed".
Use the words of the English language as they are defined, not as you happen to want them to be interpreted at the moment.
Also, you clearly either did not read my post to Sterling or can't add 1 and 1 together.
Let me help you.
My original post was "BTW: At least we can be sure he'll lose his CCP". Take a minute and check this. This is where the discussion started.
I told Sterling not to waste his breath arguing the difference between suspended and revoked.
One either has or does not have a CCP.
(Follow me closely here and pay attention - this is the tricky part).
If one used to have a CCP and no longer has one, HE'S LOST HIS CCP.
Just about everything else that you posted is baseless, hot air opinion. They are unworthy of me wasting my time addressing, except that I note you ASSUME that there is no provision in Florida for a Judge to review the totality of the circumstances and exercise discretion in revoking someone's CCP (BIG mistake - if there's ANYTHING judges have, its shitloads of discretion).
Having come to the conclusion that you are even less bright than I thought, I believe we're about done.
In closing, in the spirit of contributing to Mock and good fellowship, I suggest that you quit before you get even further behind. Your inability to stay on topic makes you look ridiculous.
P.S. You absolutely MUST learn how to spell. Your posts are an affront to the educated.