Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SUPREME COURT FUCKERY
#8
(06-24-2022, 10:45 AM)Duchess Wrote: All of those justices who ruled on this lied in order to get their job. They all said they viewed Roe V Wade as established law. They wouldn't have gotten confirmed otherwise.

Have you forgotten that time Billy Clinton parsed the meaning of "is"? That's how lawyers think, and act. It's wrong on principle, but in the world of partisan dewshbaggery, the fucktarded masses only complain when it goes against their pet issues.

As for "settled law", the summary of Roe vs Wade explicitly states a caveat that leaves the door open for it's demise, which means it was never a done deal.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-13-2022, 05:05 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-24-2022, 10:15 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-24-2022, 10:41 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-24-2022, 10:45 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by rothschild - 06-24-2022, 06:55 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by cannongal - 06-24-2022, 10:46 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by pyropappy - 06-24-2022, 12:12 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-24-2022, 06:12 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-24-2022, 07:16 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by rothschild - 06-25-2022, 12:38 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by BigMark - 06-24-2022, 07:18 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by MirahM - 06-24-2022, 08:50 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by BigMark - 06-25-2022, 12:03 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by cannongal - 06-26-2022, 03:44 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-27-2022, 08:31 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-27-2022, 11:03 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by MirahM - 06-27-2022, 01:02 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by cannongal - 06-27-2022, 03:48 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-27-2022, 01:10 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by MirahM - 06-27-2022, 02:02 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-27-2022, 02:39 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by pyropappy - 06-27-2022, 08:13 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-29-2022, 06:22 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by cannongal - 06-29-2022, 07:22 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 06-29-2022, 08:35 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by cannongal - 06-29-2022, 08:58 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 07-02-2022, 07:41 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by pyropappy - 07-03-2022, 04:53 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Maggot - 07-02-2022, 07:50 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by rothschild - 07-03-2022, 06:27 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by pyropappy - 07-03-2022, 09:54 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by MirahM - 07-03-2022, 07:42 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by rothschild - 07-03-2022, 07:47 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by pyropappy - 07-03-2022, 10:08 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by pyropappy - 07-03-2022, 10:34 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by rothschild - 07-03-2022, 11:45 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by pyropappy - 07-04-2022, 07:17 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by rothschild - 07-04-2022, 07:45 AM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Clang McFly - 07-04-2022, 04:23 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Duchess - 07-04-2022, 04:46 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Maggot - 07-04-2022, 05:34 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by rothschild - 07-04-2022, 08:05 PM
RE: SUPREME COURT FUCKERY - by Clang McFly - 07-05-2022, 06:30 AM