07-23-2023, 03:10 PM
I feel that I did provide some concrete examples that support my position, including one that specificly referenced a corporation that is among the largest. Small corporations are of very little consequence in the globalist ecosystem. Everything that's perceived to have significant value is subsumed. The rest are subject to the crippling economic volatility that's sweeping the world -- by intention. Some will have the wherewithal to survive, most will not, IMO, unless a dramatic shift occurs -- which I very much hope is the case.
I also referenced BlackRock and Vanguard, which have an *insane* amount of capital at their disposal. They were built up over time for the express purpose of forcing the compliance of corporations that are resistant to the latest iteration of the "NWO". "Get woke, go broke" is oblivious to the fact that profitability is now secondary to EGS compliance. Corporations aren't being mismanaged, they are literally being forced to behave in the manner we are now seeing -- a manner which appears to be irrational but is not. BlackRock's CEO recently stated that noncompliance with EGS standards is not an option, and he means that.
One thing the gobalists excel at is leveraging wealth and power, which is of far greater importance than the amount one has at their disposal. They are masters in this art, and have been for centuries. They also take the long view, and think ahead far into the future, unlike the vast majority of us, who are incapable of thinking ahead one year, much less lifetimes.
As for nations, the Western World is ruled almost entirely by people who have no national allegiance at all. "Build Back Better" means economic deconstruction, which is precisely what we're experiencing. These "leaders" are committed to relinquishing all of the sovereignty that remains in their respective nations -- which isn't very much at this point in time.
As for American politics, extreme polarization coupled with the circumstances inflicted by the response to the "pandemic" are all that I think is necessary to preclude the possibility of large-scale resistance. Riots, yes; effective, large-scale resistance, absolutely not. That requires healthy family structure and healthy community. As isolated individuals we're defenseless. Most of us who have the wherewithal to take this in stride are incapable or unwilling to look beyond electoral politics, which is completely insulated from policymaking. Wedge issues comprise the totality of what is addressed by politics, IMO, and that is merely theatre.
What percentage of the American electorate do you think understands sovereignty, much less appreciates it's significance?
Those who tick off both boxes are where resistance is occurring, and I don't know whether or not it will be sufficient. I think the prospects are far better in a nation such as France, where stiff resistance has been going on for the last two to three years. They understand the stakes, but even then, what happens when severe food shortages become the new "emergency" requiring the "expertise" of the "public health" industry?
With respect to the Nazi quest for lebensraum, that sorry chapter was set up by the usual suspects prior to WWI. The Versailles Treaty paved the way for the rise of a loutish man who would not otherwise have been accepted by German society. The Dawes and Young Plans established the cartels that were essential for German remilitarization.
John D. Rockefeller transferred the technical processes for the manufacture of synthetic rubber and the fuel required for the German air force, both of which were absolutely essential for German military success. Rockefeller also sold fuel to Japan for it's navy. This was documented by Treasury Secretary Henry Morganthau, whose papers are at the Roosevelt Presidential Library in Hyde Park.
The quest for lebensraum failed, but success was never in the cards. The war was a stunning success for Zionism, paving the way for the establishment of Israel, and neutering the great powers of Continental Europe, and Imperial Japan, establishing the US as a global superpower -- under the thumb of the Federal Reserve System. The CIA was the brainchild of that system, which gives insight into it's intended purpose, I think. BlackRock is an extension of that dark hierarchy.
Finally, I believe you're referencing thesis-->antithesis-->synthesis, which is today referred to as problem-->reaction-->solution, of which the pandemic is a perfect example. 9⁄11 is another one. The origin is found in Hegelian dialectics, upon which Marx and Engels developed dialectical materialism, which was further advanced by other Marxists. Communism obviously comes to mind, here. It's function, I think, lies in the dynamics associated with empire, e.g., the necessity for official "enemies". How else can a permanent wartime economy be rationalized?
Re the here and now, there comes a point where the cat gets out of the bag, so to speak. Obviously, this plays out along partisan lines, and will continue to do so as long as the progression remains gradual. I'm not sure if the globalists have the luxury of continued graduality, though. I think they're "all-in" at this point, resistance is building, and the clock is ticking. What are your thoughts here?
Let me know if I left something unanswered.
I also referenced BlackRock and Vanguard, which have an *insane* amount of capital at their disposal. They were built up over time for the express purpose of forcing the compliance of corporations that are resistant to the latest iteration of the "NWO". "Get woke, go broke" is oblivious to the fact that profitability is now secondary to EGS compliance. Corporations aren't being mismanaged, they are literally being forced to behave in the manner we are now seeing -- a manner which appears to be irrational but is not. BlackRock's CEO recently stated that noncompliance with EGS standards is not an option, and he means that.
One thing the gobalists excel at is leveraging wealth and power, which is of far greater importance than the amount one has at their disposal. They are masters in this art, and have been for centuries. They also take the long view, and think ahead far into the future, unlike the vast majority of us, who are incapable of thinking ahead one year, much less lifetimes.
As for nations, the Western World is ruled almost entirely by people who have no national allegiance at all. "Build Back Better" means economic deconstruction, which is precisely what we're experiencing. These "leaders" are committed to relinquishing all of the sovereignty that remains in their respective nations -- which isn't very much at this point in time.
As for American politics, extreme polarization coupled with the circumstances inflicted by the response to the "pandemic" are all that I think is necessary to preclude the possibility of large-scale resistance. Riots, yes; effective, large-scale resistance, absolutely not. That requires healthy family structure and healthy community. As isolated individuals we're defenseless. Most of us who have the wherewithal to take this in stride are incapable or unwilling to look beyond electoral politics, which is completely insulated from policymaking. Wedge issues comprise the totality of what is addressed by politics, IMO, and that is merely theatre.
What percentage of the American electorate do you think understands sovereignty, much less appreciates it's significance?
Those who tick off both boxes are where resistance is occurring, and I don't know whether or not it will be sufficient. I think the prospects are far better in a nation such as France, where stiff resistance has been going on for the last two to three years. They understand the stakes, but even then, what happens when severe food shortages become the new "emergency" requiring the "expertise" of the "public health" industry?
With respect to the Nazi quest for lebensraum, that sorry chapter was set up by the usual suspects prior to WWI. The Versailles Treaty paved the way for the rise of a loutish man who would not otherwise have been accepted by German society. The Dawes and Young Plans established the cartels that were essential for German remilitarization.
John D. Rockefeller transferred the technical processes for the manufacture of synthetic rubber and the fuel required for the German air force, both of which were absolutely essential for German military success. Rockefeller also sold fuel to Japan for it's navy. This was documented by Treasury Secretary Henry Morganthau, whose papers are at the Roosevelt Presidential Library in Hyde Park.
The quest for lebensraum failed, but success was never in the cards. The war was a stunning success for Zionism, paving the way for the establishment of Israel, and neutering the great powers of Continental Europe, and Imperial Japan, establishing the US as a global superpower -- under the thumb of the Federal Reserve System. The CIA was the brainchild of that system, which gives insight into it's intended purpose, I think. BlackRock is an extension of that dark hierarchy.
Finally, I believe you're referencing thesis-->antithesis-->synthesis, which is today referred to as problem-->reaction-->solution, of which the pandemic is a perfect example. 9⁄11 is another one. The origin is found in Hegelian dialectics, upon which Marx and Engels developed dialectical materialism, which was further advanced by other Marxists. Communism obviously comes to mind, here. It's function, I think, lies in the dynamics associated with empire, e.g., the necessity for official "enemies". How else can a permanent wartime economy be rationalized?
Re the here and now, there comes a point where the cat gets out of the bag, so to speak. Obviously, this plays out along partisan lines, and will continue to do so as long as the progression remains gradual. I'm not sure if the globalists have the luxury of continued graduality, though. I think they're "all-in" at this point, resistance is building, and the clock is ticking. What are your thoughts here?
Let me know if I left something unanswered.