03-26-2022, 09:49 PM
(03-26-2022, 09:33 PM)MirahM Wrote:(03-25-2022, 09:59 PM)rothschild Wrote:(03-25-2022, 08:23 PM)MirahM Wrote: A big difference.
Why? She was on the board, if the principal had decided to bring back the old Dick and Jane series, do you think there is even a remote chance that they would not have decided to terminate their employment?
If Ibrahim Kendi's assertion that a baby -- yes, a baby -- is either antiracist or racist is defensible, why not weigh in on it? I certainly would if I thought it was possible to present a rational defense of such a ludicrous assertion.
#1 she was not dishonest in her reply. And in fact she talked about that children needed to be valued and not to be made to feel a certain way.
#2 CRT isn't a part of her job or what makes her able to do her job. She did point out that Amy Coney Barrett also had ties to a private school.
She is not there to discuss how an author feels about something. She answered the question perfectly.
Why do you think parsing words equates to a perfect answer?
As for Barrett, I don't like her at all. Just another elitist snob as best I can tell, ditto for Kavanaugh. They all are. Whatever corporations want, corporations get.